Who is to decide what we think?

How free is our thought process? It is often influenced by many factors  - to mention one of it.. readon...
This is not here to justify anyones claim but a mere look at set of outcome of the incidents which leads a person to a conclusion

Really I hate politics and desist from making any remarks or even mention on any of the subject. But some of the the obvious happenings are not so obvious for the general crowd and I use to wonder how is it possible, that it's hard to notice even when it's out there.
convention followed
A    -    thinkers
B    -    stereotypes

"put a picture of a bike and say it's a car"
Is truth something that is a proprietary of highly educated and experienced chaps who happen to work for an institution and any other independent researcher has no value in the amt of time spend on the related subject.
Why tag something as truther/conspiracy theorist(A) when the ones tagging it are the conspirator(B) themselves. They(B) always want factual evidence by making all of the document/evidence/video footage their own or under confidential tag and expect a normal guy get factual evidence.. how simple is that
Some question to the B's
  • It was said that the 911 terrorist master mind had to be captured - where is he now ?
  • Iraq was suppose to have WMD - where is the fatual evidence.
  • By attacking terroist have you been able to give peace in that region.

If you stand against atrocities, why is that the country involved in unit 731 heinous act is under your protection and why the Palestinian are still suffering in their own land.
It shows only one thing - it for their own interest they are working, for which they will influence the outcome.
These are the guys(supporters as well), who get in debunking, the claims in one the documentary made by a normal guy - even though it was his interest in making himself known that he got involved in create film(s) (which he liked presumably) isn't that we all try to do...
Finding petty faults like volcanic dust pyro or not donating to 911 sufferers or any other is like degrading debunkers
Look at some of the lame stuff(youtube.com) uploaded in order to debunk the claims of documentary - the BBC is showing where the guy lives and how he bought the laptop and what get him started, really pathetically stuff - yep forgot that you need to be in a iso/cmm level company to create truth how very lame. If a guy living in a 12*12 room with laptop bought from shack, can investigate so much about an incident, why not the so called system with so much of resource do it...
So now that it's like investigative scout(A) vs corrupt politician claim(B)
Hmm... lemme guess, probably will go with the investigative scout...

Goodness me... If such a developed nation is manipulating everything then it goes without saying that the country that I am currently enrolled to is in a real mess and no body wants to notice since they are involved in the business of life as they say.
Ridiculous political system/democracy. How to bring the culprits to justice... how can you possibly believe the legal system, which falls under the same system which made this horrific act look like a terror strike... even if the process of justice is carried out they can simply influence the outcome of any investigation.. feeling really helpless .. aren't we just puppets in the hands of these puppeteers.

ref:- 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7E3oIbO0AWE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Yx9NRX37SM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAS4TIYF68A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tmakyb5bZec
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BItUnPhExU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEDuXyRQR28
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2uED3bD91Y
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FoAftFBLdiI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaNeOoDaeu0


search for related videos

0 comments:

Post a Comment

top